Leave it up to Amanda Bynes to further baffle us after learning she
was reportedly kicked out a New York gym for smoking weed this past
weekend.
According to RumorFix, the former Nickelodeon star was booted
from the Planet Fitness in Harlem and had her membership revoked, when
she was discovered smoking marijuana in the women's locker room.
Of all the places to celebrate 4/20,
we didn't think anyone would be doing it at a gym. A Planet Fitness
employee, who told the website the gym "does not allow lunks to workout
here, and especially no weed smokers," added that Bynes did not take the
news that the company was canceling her membership very well, and was
seen storming out.
Cigarette online prices. We present you the best brands to help you in finding the right cigarette brand for your personality.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Amanda Bynes flees apartment after threatened with eviction for smoking pot.
Amanda Bynes has reportedly moved out of her New York City apartment after receiving a threat of eviction from her building manager. The manager claims that Bynes was a shitty tenant, a “disrespectful rule-breaker,” a “building nuisance,” a scoundrel, a scofflaw, a scallywag, a Spicoli, and a fink. But rather than change her finky ways and stop smoking mountains of sticky marijuana-pot day and night (that’s the cool terminology, right? I am 100 years old), Bynes just packed up and moved. You’re not my dad, building manager! YOU CAN’T FIRE ME, I QUIT.
Apparently things came to a head at Amanda’s building residence after a number of tenants began complaining about the overwhelming smell wafting into the corridors courtesy of her chilling the good shit. In fact the complaints escalated to that of Amanda even to at times smoking the good shit in the hallways.
Then again management does stress it’s a no bullshit tolerating smoking building.
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
No more cigarettes means 10 more years for women
A massive new study about smoking cigarettes from the University of Oxford in
the U.K. has reported breathtaking results. Doctors and researchers
found the nasty effects associated with cigarettes years ago, but this
study focused on the harms of smoking as well as the benefits of
quitting. Putting aside the knowledge society has about cigarettes
already, the findings of this study could serve as yet another
motivation for smokers to quit.
One of the largest studies ever done on the subject, Sir Richard Peto - a professor at the University of Oxford -
One of the largest studies ever done on the subject, Sir Richard Peto - a professor at the University of Oxford -
Big Pharma = big-time poverty
Getting back to the main point of this, which is Big Tobacco and Big
Pharma, we were talking about why people work for these organizations
when these organizations are actually doing such evil, or engaging in
the creation of such pain and suffering, and even death. Here in the
United States, we're also talking about economic poverty created by both
of these companies.
Big Tobacco includes cigarettes.Tobacco companies make people poor, because they hook them on a product that's expensive to buy; and they have to keep buying it, because they're addicted to it. You'll notice that people who smoke tend to be on a lower economic scale. Part of that is the vicious feedback cycle; if you start smoking, you will get poorer. As you get poorer, you will continue to smoke more because life is terrible and you need your nicotine high just to feel okay. Thus, it's a downward spiral into oblivion.
Cancer is no infectious disease
The idea that you can reverse cancer by taking a synthetic chemical
compound or prescription drug is, at its very core, nonsense. Because
there is no such infectious disease as "cancer," there is no microbial
invader. In fact, there isn't even a tissue or a physical element that
you can point to and look at under a microscope and say, "That is
cancer."
Some people mistakenly say, "Well, sure you can. You can take a tumor out of the body, and you can put that under a microscope and call it cancer. However, that’s not cancer. That's the side effect of cancer, because cancer is a systemic failure of the immune system. It's a systemic disease. It is actually a condition. It is a lack of the body's ability to self-regulate its own cell growth, to clean up its own blood, tissues, bones, bone marrow, and so on.
This is the nature of cancer; you can't put that under a microscope and look at it. In the germ theory of disease, however, scientists are always trying to look at cancer under a microscope, where they can put it down and say, "This is the microbe, see? There's the virus" or "There's the bacteria" or "There's the parasite." They still try to do that today by saying, "Alzheimer's is based on the nervous system. Put it under a microscope and there you can see plaque. Plaque on the nervous system." They think that's the cause of the disease. It's not, it's just a side effect.
Some people mistakenly say, "Well, sure you can. You can take a tumor out of the body, and you can put that under a microscope and call it cancer. However, that’s not cancer. That's the side effect of cancer, because cancer is a systemic failure of the immune system. It's a systemic disease. It is actually a condition. It is a lack of the body's ability to self-regulate its own cell growth, to clean up its own blood, tissues, bones, bone marrow, and so on.
This is the nature of cancer; you can't put that under a microscope and look at it. In the germ theory of disease, however, scientists are always trying to look at cancer under a microscope, where they can put it down and say, "This is the microbe, see? There's the virus" or "There's the bacteria" or "There's the parasite." They still try to do that today by saying, "Alzheimer's is based on the nervous system. Put it under a microscope and there you can see plaque. Plaque on the nervous system." They think that's the cause of the disease. It's not, it's just a side effect.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

